Constitution Rights Essay

In the United States, due process refers to a manipulate of established legal principles, derived from the Constitution, that conceivek to protect the rights of citizens. Inga Johannsen was put in a situation in which she was discriminated invidiously. Citizens of the United States were treated unequally, ending in a very un bring together result for Johannsen. The study that was found in Utopia was verbalize to be too new to be fully evaluated, meaning, Inga should not stomach been fired until at least further evidence of this study was state to be accurate, if anything.If the situation was different, for example, Inga had expert been hired by the school zone the results may not abide been such discrimination towards her personally. However, being verbalize that she has been working for four years and 364 days, the scenario is 100% unfair and self-discriminating. The time Inga has been with this zone is a proven fact that she is indeed a very strong teacher for second gra ders, or she wouldnt still be working. I believe that to fire someone whos been so dedicated to their bank line and has offered the school district itself so much of their time over a sensory hair color is simply wrong.This is a new study that was just found through the think tank and should only be in affect for those whom argon trying to be placed as a teacher in the forthcoming. Inga wasnt given the chance to see if this incident study was found to be accurate, which could ask resulted in her changing her hair color instantly. The due process isnt providing Inga with any fair procedures, which is only if why it is acquittance against itself in this situation. The second she said she wouldnt be changing her hair color, the only solution the school took was to fire her. well-nighthing could have been easily worked out for her considering her experience and history. Inga was an individual whom was unmistakably acted against on as an individual. In my point of view she has bee n neglected her of life, liberty or property. The political relation has every right to forbid baton Barroners advertisement for his bar. Yes, he is promoting alcohol to under years students, however Barroner is also going against legal or moral ownership rights. This rights were failed to be mentioned in the scenario but could have been brought up by the government if Billy tried to argue the case.Underage inebriety is a serious manner in many colleges. Binge crapulence can lead to serious health issues and in some cases, future alcoholism. To promote this on a campus isnt morally correct and is going against the drinking age law. Other actions could have been put into affect for Billys business. One action Billy could have taken would have been to promote his business elsewhere, which would have resulted in almost the same traffic flow. He could have attempted to advertise his special in town, where it would be targeted towards people off age, but college students would stil l be able to see as well.It would have been beneficial for him due to the fact that students dont stay on campus, they do go into town as well. Some may argue that the government went against his rights, considering its a free rude and we are granted the freedom of speech however there are laws and rights that Billy didnt obey. The government in this situation was very fair and reasonable Billy just took the action without thinking of the consequences and the drinking age law.