Plato Knowledge Essay

Aristotles Posterior Analytics Reading Questions (1) In the Meno, Plato argued that it was impossible for us to learn something genuinely smart if you cheat x, you neednt expect about x, and if you dont know x, you wont describe it when you find it. Thus, Plato argued, all learning is really recollection. Aristotle is trying to give a different answer to the Meno problem, one that doesnt involve reincarnating or Platonic Forms. What is it? Aristotle argues that knowledge must be displayed in the demonstrative structure of a science.(2) How and why does Aristotle single out things forward and break off known to us from things anterior and better known by disposition? He distinguishes things prior and better known to us from things prior and better known by constitution in Posterior Analytics. What is better known to us versus what is known by nature is not the same thing because what is known to us is affected by our perception. Whereas we have what is prior and better k nown by nature which is furthest from perception (particular vs universal is how he describes such.He proves we will solving in Platos theory in the Meno of confirming what we already know or learning nothing at all if we fail to distinguish between the two. (3) Why does Aristotle deny that everything can be demonstrated? Aristotle denies that not everything can be demonstrated. Those of which whom allow circular demonstration (i. e If A, therefore B, then A must equal C. ) atomic number 18 reiterating that in conclusion, A is A at all times. This method can be apply to prove anything because we are not considering the distinctive properties of each factor.Also, concluding that the results are not deduction nor relevant to the things assumed. (4) Can you explain Aristotles lease that perception produces the universal in us? How does this explain how something indemonstrable can be known? Aristotle claims that perception produces the universal in us it describes that we have pri or knowledge of a subject that is a commonly accepted mentation until one of the factors from that subject proves otherwise. It is not to say that because one takes a root that all others will do as well but by dint of reasoning we can come to a paradigm shift that accepts the new theory.It would not need to be demonstrated then but scarce understood and accepted amongst the community. (5) Plato would agree with Aristotle that we can know x in virtue of having demonstrated that x. But he would disagree with Aristotles sum up of how indemonstrable can be known. Why, and what would he say instead? Plato would disagree with Aristotles account of how indemonstrable can be known because where he understood universals as forms, Aristotle believes universals are generalizations from particulars.